Allen Maurice Little v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant \has not met his burden of establishing that the district court had jurisdiction over his post-conviction motion to compel.\
• “[Section] 3231 by itself doesn’t give the district court jurisdiction over all post-conviction motions.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “Even a pro se appellant has an affirmative obligation to inform us in the opening brief of the basis for the district court’s jurisdiction.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).