Allen Kane's Major Dodge, Inc. v. Barnes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a party may avoid summary judgment with circumstantial evidence only if it “render[s] less probable all inconsistent conclusions” (punctuation omitted)
• explaining that “there exists a point where the inferences to be drawn” from circumstantial evidence “can not, as a matter of law, be sufficient to support a verdict” (punctuation omitted)
• noting that a party on whom a burden of proof rests may meet that burden with circumstantial evidence only if such evidence “tend[s] in some proximate degree to establish the conclusion he claims” and “also render[s] less probable all inconsistent conclusions” (punctuation omitted)
• where the other fact to which this quote referred “was that the employee was ‘subject to call at any time’ ”
• where the employee testified that he had been \barhopping\ when the collision occurred
• where the employee testified that he had been “barhopping” when the collision occurred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).