Allen G. Charles, M.D. v. Bernard Carey, the Hope Clinic for Women v. William J. Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting , the state’s claim of conflict of interest in a challenge to a counseling law designed to “protect women from abusive medical practices”
• rejecting the state’s claim of conflict of interest in a challenge to a counseling law designed to “protect women from abusive medical practices”
• rejecting the state’s claim of conflict of interest in a challenge to a counseling law designed to “protect women from abusive medical practices”
• requirement that physician personally conduct informed consent consultation; “The burdensomeness of this requirement is evident.”
• requirement that physician personally conduct informed consent consultation; \The burdensomeness of this requirement is evident.\
• \direct interference\ is shown where impact is not de minimus or where regulation imposes restrictions \that did not already exist\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).