Skip to main content
· 1/29/2013

Allen F. Grazer v. Gordon A. Jones

Citations

  • 154 Idaho 58
  • 294 P.3d 184
  • 2013 Ida. LEXIS 34

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that a Uniform Act “filing does not involve initiating a new case” so “[n]o new Idaho judgment is created”
  • clarifying that the correct date to measure a judgment lien’s life under the EFJA is from the foreign jurisdiction’s entry of the judgment, not the date it was recorded in Idaho
  • “An EFJA [Equal Force of Judgment Act4] filing does not involve initiating a new case.”
  • “A judgment lien is distinct from the underlying judgment, and therefore the judgment does not expire merely because the lien has expired.”
  • “An action on a judgment results in a completely new Idaho judgment in favor of the judgment creditor.”
  • “An action on a judgment results in a completely new Idaho judgment in favor of the judgment creditor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burdick, Eismann, Jones, Horton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.