Allen D. McFadden, Jr. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a the “record evidence, even viewed most favorably to Ward, does not ‘fully convince’ that [managerial employees] participated in or condoned willful or wanton conduct under North Carolina law”
• allowing recovery of compensatory damages under both ADA and intentional infliction of emotional distress, finding one compensated for physical injuries and the other compensated for emotional injuries
• discussing Title VII’s requirements before punitive damages may be awarded
• also noting the circuit split on the issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).