Allemannia Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v. Firemen's Ins. Co. of Baltimore Ex Rel. Wolfe
Citations
- 209 U.S. 326
- 28 S. Ct. 544
- 52 L. Ed. 815
- 1908 U.S. LEXIS 1706
Syllabus
<p>Reinsurance has a well known meaning, and, as the usual compact of reinsurance has been understood in the commercial world for many years, the liability of the reinsurer is not affected by. the insolvency of the re-insured company or by the inability of the latter to fulfill its own con- . tracts with the original insured; and in this case the compact, notwithstanding it refers to losses paid, will be construed to cover losses payable by the reinsured .company; and, in a suit by the. receiver of that company on the compact, the fact of its insolvency and non-payment of the risks reinsured doés not constitute a defense.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The only question before the [C]ourt is ... the construction of the language of the reinsurance compact.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Peckham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.