Allegheny International, Inc. v. Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to employ the “drastic remedy” of mandamus relief, notwithstanding an appellant’s asserted Seventh Amendment right to jury trial, because a pending pretrial motion might have disposed of the case
• refusing to employ the \drastic remedy\ of mandamus relief, notwithstanding an appellant’s asserted Seventh Amendment right to jury trial, because a pending pretrial motion might have disposed of the case
• “A district court’s decision is final and appealable for purposes of § 1291 only when the decision ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• \A district court's decision is final and appealable for purposes of § 1291 only when the decision ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment.\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[d]espite courts’ general reluctance to issue writs of mandamus, the Supreme Court has stated that it is ‘the responsibility of the Federal Courts of Appeals to grant mandamus where necessary to protect the constitutional right to trial by jury.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).