Skip to main content
· 9/29/1976

Allan F. Breed v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Lionel Taylor and Henry Parker, Real Parties in Interest

Citations

  • 542 F.2d 1114

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, when a question of federal law is at issue, “[s]tate law [as to privileges] may provide a useful referent, but it is not controlling”
  • recognizing minors’ 13 || privacy interest in not having their identities disclosed
  • balancing the need for the information sought against the privacy right asserted to 17 resolve privacy objection
  • balancing the invasion of minor’s privacy rights against the plaintiffs’ need for juvenile ward files
  • state privilege law, while not binding in federal question case, can be a useful reference
  • “[A]s required by Kerr, we recognize ‘that in camera review is a highly appropriate and useful means of dealing with claims of governmental privilege.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duniway, Sneed, Plummer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.