· 9/29/1976
Allan F. Breed v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Lionel Taylor and Henry Parker, Real Parties in Interest
Citations
- 542 F.2d 1114
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, when a question of federal law is at issue, “[s]tate law [as to privileges] may provide a useful referent, but it is not controlling”
- recognizing minors’ 13 || privacy interest in not having their identities disclosed
- balancing the need for the information sought against the privacy right asserted to 17 resolve privacy objection
- balancing the invasion of minor’s privacy rights against the plaintiffs’ need for juvenile ward files
- state privilege law, while not binding in federal question case, can be a useful reference
- “[A]s required by Kerr, we recognize ‘that in camera review is a highly appropriate and useful means of dealing with claims of governmental privilege.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Duniway, Sneed, Plummer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.