Allan and Conrad v. University of Cent. Fl.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prohibition was not available to review the trial court’s order that rejected an affirmative defense based upon the applicable statute of limitations
• holding that prohibition was not available to review the trial court's order that rejected an affirmative defense based upon the applicable statute of limitations
• observing that prohibition cannot be used to divest a lower court of jurisdiction to hear and determine the issue of its own jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).