Allah v. Goord

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Plaintiff sufficiently alleged the objective prong based on allegations that his wheelchair was not properly secured during transports, and that he consequently fell to the floor of a van, suffering “serious injury to his head, neck, and back”
• holding that a wheelchair- bound plaintiff sufficiently alleged a denial of service by reason of his disability when he was transported to an outside medical facility in a van in which his wheelchair was not properly secured, resulting in his injury
• denying motion to dismiss where defendants were aware that prisoners in wheelchairs had been injured during transport and failed to remedy the situation
• permitting an ADA claim to proceed based on the allegation that insufficient transportation offered to a disabled inmate prevented the inmate from enjoying the benefits of outside medical services

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).