Skip to main content
· 9/18/2006

All Tech Co. v. Laimer Unicon, LLC

Citations

  • 636 S.E.2d 753
  • 281 Ga. App. 579
  • 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 2959
  • 2006 Ga. App. LEXIS 1177

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that even if seller provided buyer with substantial services in conjunction with the sale of goods, four-year statute of limitation applied because the predominant element of the contract was sale of goods
  • holding that even if seller provided buyer with substantial services in conjunction with the sale of goods, four-year statute of limitation applied because the predominant element of the contract was sale of goods
  • treating brief as cross motion for summary judgment despite failure to label it as such
  • the substance of a motion and not its mere nomenclature controls as pleadings are judged by their function rather than name given by a party
  • where plaintiff was seeking to recover payment for all invoices billed to defendant’s account over a two-year period, trial court properly treated action as one on an open account
  • where plaintiff was seeking to recover payment for all invoices billed to defendant’s account over a two-year period, trial court properly treated action as one on an open account

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Andrews, Bernes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.