California Court of Appeal· 6/21/1989
All Points Traders, Inc. v. Barrington Associates
Citations
- 211 Cal. App. 3d 723
- 259 Cal. Rptr. 780
- 1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 632
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that real estate broker's license is required when negotiating the sale of 100% of corporate stock
- holding that real estate broker's license is required when negotiating the sale of 100% of a corporation's stock
- finding that a real estate license is required when the sale of the company is entirely through a stock sale
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Arabian
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court· 1992-07-30· cited 753×
- Richey v. Autonation, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2015-01-29· cited 128×
- Preach v. Monter RainbowCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1993-01-29· cited 59×
- Lindenstadt v. Staff Builders, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1997-06-10· cited 50×
- Akopyan v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2013-04-04· cited 24×
- Bayscene Resident Negotiators v. Bayscene Mobilehome ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1993-04-23· cited 23×
- Lopes v. MillsapCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1992-06-04· cited 15×
- Ashton General Partnership, Inc. v. Federal Data Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-08-22· cited 14×
- Hotels Nevada, LLC v. Bridge Banc, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-08-01· cited 14×
- Salazar v. Interland, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2007-06-26· cited 8×
- Sachs v. LesserCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2007-05-17· cited 8×
- Venturi & Co. LLC v. Pacific Malibu Development Corp.California Court of Appeal· 2009-04-10· cited 7×
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP v. J-M Mfg. Co.California Court of Appeals, 2nd District· 2016-01-29· cited 4×
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton v. J-M Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal· 2016-01-29
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton v. J-M Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal· 2016-02-26
- Brown v. TGS Management Co., LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2020-11-12
- Brawerman v. Loeb & Loeb LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2022-08-03
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Madden v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-08-10· cited 275×
- Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1957-03-19· cited 225×
- Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court· 1949-03-18· cited 159×
- Goddard v. District of Columbia Redevelopment Land AgencySupreme Court· 1961-05-01· cited 61×
- Brown v. Allied Corrugated Box Co.California Court of Appeal· 1979-04-03· cited 37×
- Ray Wilson Co. v. Anaheim Memorial Hospital Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1985-04-16· cited 32×
- Buckley v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1960-08-22· cited 31×
- Schantz v. EllsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1971-08-16· cited 23×
- Lindholm v. GalvinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1979-07-26· cited 23×
- Abbott v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1977-03-31· cited 22×
- Crofoot v. SpivakCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1952-09-19· cited 21×
- Gonzales & Co., Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1984-01-25· cited 20×
- Springer v. RosauerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1982-03-18· cited 15×
- Lyons v. StevensonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1977-01-04· cited 14×
- Hirsch v. EnsignCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1981-07-29· cited 13×
- Owen v. OffCalifornia Supreme Court· 1951-02-20· cited 12×
- M. C. & D. Capital Corp. v. GilmakerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-09-07· cited 11×
- Weber v. JorgensenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1971-03-17· cited 11×
- Webb v. West Side District HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1983-07-14· cited 11×
- Cardillo v. Canusa Extrusion Engineering, IncMichigan Court of Appeals· 1985-09-03· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.