Alki Partners, L.P. v. Vatas Holding GmbH

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that dismissal of claims under Rule 12(b)(6) rubric is permissible even in absence of motion so long as plaintiff was given opportunity to respond and dismissing complaint as to non-moving defendant
• dismissing, sua sponte, claims against a non-appearing, non-moving defendant where motions by other defendants put the plaintiff on notice of the ground for dismissal
• dismissing claims against a non-appearing, non-moving defendant sua sponte where motions by other defendants put the plaintiff on notice of the ground for dismissal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).