First Circuit· 11/30/1998
Alison H. v. Byard
Citations
- 163 F.3d 2
- 1998 WL 804562
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that it \ma[de] no difference\ whether the court applied an abuse of discretion or de novo standard because reversal was warranted under either one
- stating the 16 preliminary injunction test as requiring a showing that the moving party is “substantially likely to succeed on the merits of its claim”
- “Because the standard of review is a procedural matter, not a substantive one, we are bound by federal law.”
- “Under Massachusetts law, ‘[w]here the wording of the contract is unambiguous, the contract must be enforced according to its terms’ ” (citations omitted)
- FDIC v. Singh, 977 F.2d 18, 22 (1st Cir. 1992); see, e.g., F.D.I.C. v. O’Flahaven, 857 F. Supp. 154, 159 (D.N.H. 1994) (denying motion for summary judgment on grounds that contract was ambiguous and “subject to genuine debate”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boudin, Coffin, Bownes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gorman v. GormanSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2005-08-26· cited 62×
- Lanier Professional Services, Inc. v. RicciFirst Circuit· 1999-09-21· cited 58×
- Nadherny v. Roseland Property Co.First Circuit· 2004-11-23· cited 51×
- McAdams v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceFirst Circuit· 2004-12-01· cited 47×
- Nicolaci v. AnapolFirst Circuit· 2004-10-20· cited 42×
- Town of Hinsdale v. Town of ChesterfieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2005-12-29· cited 18×
- Thomas & Betts Corporation v. Alfa Laval, Inc.First Circuit· 2019-02-06· cited 16×
- Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. United Rentals (N. Am.), Inc.First Circuit· 2020-10-02· cited 11×
- FHS Properties v. BC AssociatesFirst Circuit· 2000-08-02· cited 8×
- Clark v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.D. Rhode Island· 2014-03-27· cited 6×
- Strange v. Genesis InsuranceD. Massachusetts· 2008-02-28· cited 5×
- Agri-Mark, Inc. v. Niro, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 2002-12-04· cited 5×
- Rectrix Aerodome Centers, Inc. v. Barnstable Municipal Airport CommissionD. Massachusetts· 2009-07-10· cited 4×
- Vermont Mutual Insurance v. PetitD. Massachusetts· 2009-05-11· cited 3×
- Demers Bros. Trucking, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd'sD. Massachusetts· 2009-03-03· cited 3×
- Contour Design v. Chance Mold SteelD. New Hampshire· 2010-01-14· cited 3×
- Powers v. MukpoMassachusetts Superior Court· 2000-10-02· cited 2×
- Ferraris v. AzimuthD. New Hampshire· 2001-01-03· cited 2×
- Era v. Morton Community BankD. Rhode Island· 2014-03-28· cited 1×
- Arsenault v. Metropolitan LifeD. New Hampshire· 2004-10-01· cited 1×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-13· cited 3,761×
- Vincent DeNOVELLIS, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant, AppelleeFirst Circuit· 1997-09-02· cited 448×
- Fashion House, Inc. v. K Mart Corporation, Fashion House, Inc. v. K Mart CorporationFirst Circuit· 1989-12-19· cited 294×
- Roland C. Dubois and Restore: The North Woods v. United States Department of Agriculture, and Loon Mountain Recreation CorporationFirst Circuit· 1996-12-19· cited 210×
- John P. Coyne v. Taber Partners I, D/B/A Ambassador Plaza Hotel & CasinoFirst Circuit· 1995-05-23· cited 165×
- Federation for American Immigration Reform, Inc. v. RenoSupreme Court· 1997-06-27· cited 150×
- Jefferson Insurance Co. of New York v. City of HolyokeMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1987-02-06· cited 125×
- Klonoski v. MahlabFirst Circuit· 1998-09-25· cited 99×
- County of San Diego v. California Special Education Hearing Office Grossmont Union High School District, Rosalind Fox, Counter-Defendant-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1996-08-30· cited 88×
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Pritam SinghFirst Circuit· 1992-10-07· cited 81×
- Papago Tribal Utility Authority v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arizona Public Service Company, IntervenorD.C. Circuit· 1983-12-22· cited 71×
- Dean S. Edmonds, Jr. v. United States of AmericaFirst Circuit· 1981-04-22· cited 66×
- Kathleen H., Larry H. And Daniel H. v. Massachusetts Department of EducationFirst Circuit· 1998-09-04· cited 64×
- Ismert and Associates, Inc. v. New England Mutual Life Insurance CompanyFirst Circuit· 1986-09-19· cited 63×
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Carol A. GibbsFirst Circuit· 1985-09-23· cited 38×
- Golas v. Homeview, Inc.First Circuit· 1997-02-10· cited 34×
- Fowler v. Boise Cascade Corp.First Circuit· 1991-10-29· cited 34×
- New Hampshire v. AdamsFirst Circuit· 1998-11-13· cited 18×
- United States v. Willy Marroquin, A/K/A Willy Adolfo Marroquin MendezFirst Circuit· 1998-02-17· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.