· 2/20/1980
Alim v. Doe
Citations
- 74 A.D.2d 732
- 425 N.Y.S.2d 538
- 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10423
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[C]ourts have repeatedly .concluded that waste discharges which are a concomitant of normal business activities are not ‘sudden’ within the meaning of the exclusion.”
- pollution which resulted from discharge occurring over long period of time rather than abruptly or quickly did not fall within the ambit of the exception
- “[WJaste discharges which are a concomitant of normal business activities are not ‘sudden’ within the meaning of the exclusion-”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.