Skip to main content
· 2/20/1980

Alim v. Doe

Citations

  • 74 A.D.2d 732
  • 425 N.Y.S.2d 538
  • 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10423

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[C]ourts have repeatedly .concluded that waste discharges which are a concomitant of normal business activities are not ‘sudden’ within the meaning of the exclusion.”
  • pollution which resulted from discharge occurring over long period of time rather than abruptly or quickly did not fall within the ambit of the exception
  • “[WJaste discharges which are a concomitant of normal business activities are not ‘sudden’ within the meaning of the exclusion-”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.