Align Technology, Inc. v. Tran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assessing § 426.30 “based upon both case law construing California’s compulsory cross- 13 complaint statute and federal cases interpreting the analogous Rule 13(a).”
• applying 21 California’s “compulsory cross-complaint statute and federal cases interpreting the 22 analogous Rule 13(a)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).