Alicea v. Howell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• hearing officer’s refusal to call witness from testing machine manufacturer did not violate plaintiff’s due process rights
• official’s statement that there were “no secrets in prison” and that plaintiff would “have to pay the consequences” for filing grievance insufficient to support retaliation claim
• “alleged statements to plaintiff about there being ‘no secrets in prison’ and that plaintiff would ‘have to pay the consequences’ for filing a grievance” not adverse action
• statements to prisoner that there were “no secrets in prison” and that prisoner would “have to pay the consequences for filing a grievance against [defendant]” insufficient to support retaliation claim
• defendant’s alleged statement about there being “no secrets in prison” and that plaintiff would “have to pay the consequences” for filing a grievance against the defendant was not an adverse action
• correctional officer’s statement to inmate that there are “no secrets in prison” and that he would “have to pay the consequences” for filing a grievance against the officer did not rise to the level of adverse action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).