Alice L. Ex Rel. R.L. v. Dusek

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a] notice of appeal from an interlocutory order does not produce a complete divestiture of the district court’s jurisdiction over the case,” but it does divest it “of jurisdiction over those aspects of the case on appeal”
• “A notice of appeal from an interlocutory order .. . only divests the district court of jurisdiction over those aspects of the case on appeal.”
• district court is 21 divested of jurisdiction of only “those aspects of the case on appeal”
• district court divested of jurisdiction of only “those aspects of the case on 8 appeal”
• “To the extent that [the defendant] is subject to discovery requests on claims for which she does not or cannot assert qualified immunity, such discovery requests do not implicate her right to qualified immunity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).