Skip to main content
· 10/17/2012

Alice Guth v. Tazewell County

Citations

  • 698 F.3d 580
  • 2012 WL 4901159
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 21560

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the plaintiff failed to establish a County Board’s liability for lost property value where the property “lost its value for reasons unrelated to anything the Board had ever done”
  • stating section 3 of the Act “insulat[es] farmers against nuisance suits after a farm has been in operation for a year—but with exceptions”
  • “[I]n arguing retaliation [the plaintiff] encounters an -15- unsuspected obstacle: it is more difficult to prove the bad intent of a legislative body, which is a collective, than of an individual.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Posner, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.