Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int'l

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in negligence cases, “juries determine whether and to what extent a particular duty was breached”
• noting that the sentence “became a final judgment for habeas 16 purposes once the deadline for filing the notice of appeal expired 14 days later”
• citing, inter alia, Merino v. N.Y.C. Transit Auth., 639 N.Y.S.2d 784 (App. Div. 1996)
• listing prior inconsistent statement as factor 8 ALJ may consider in assessing claimant’s testimony
• “[T]he ALJ is responsible for translating and incorporating clinical 20 || findings into a succinct RFC.”
• “[T]he ALJ is responsible for translating and incorporating clinical 15 findings into a succinct RFC.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).