Skip to main content
· 3/13/2008

Ali v. D.C. Court Services

Citations

  • 538 F. Supp. 2d 157
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19064
  • 2008 WL 668636

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that sovereign immunity barred a suit against CSOSA and its employees in their official capacities
  • concluding that sovereign immunity barred a suit against CSOSA and its employees in their official capacities and dismissing the complaint brought by a parolee as to the individual defendants, including a Court Supervision Officer and her supervisor
  • stating that the loss of funding “was not tied to the completion of specific reports”
  • dismissing for failure to state a claim a parolee’s Bivens action against CSOSA employees who, pursuant to the terms of the certificate of parole, applied a special condition and placed him under the supervision of the mental health unit
  • dismissing for failure to state a claim a parolee’s Bivens action against CSOSA employees who, pursuant to the terms of the certificate of parole, applied a special condition and placed him under the supervision of the mental health unit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rosemary M. Collyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.