· 4/12/2022
Ali Choudhri Dalio Holdings I, LLC And Dalio Holdings II, LLC v. Mokaram-Latif West Loop, Ltd. and Ali Mokaram
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding allowance of judgment notwithstanding the verdict where no expert medical testimony on causation
- describing plaintiffs’ burden of proof for injuries sustained in crashworthiness cases
- our appellate courts and those in other jurisdictions have recognized the necessity for expert medical testimony on highly technical medical issues, such as injury causation”
- “Cases involving seriously injured children present perhaps the greatest risk that jurors will improperly be influenced by emotion and sympathy”
- Product liability may be premised on “existence of some enhanced injury, i.e., an injury ‘over and above’ that which would have been sustained in the absence of the alleged defect.”
- “While it is trac that generally a plaintiff may rely on inferences to defeat a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, those inferences cannot be based on mere speculation”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.