Skip to main content
· 4/12/2022

Ali Choudhri Dalio Holdings I, LLC And Dalio Holdings II, LLC v. Mokaram-Latif West Loop, Ltd. and Ali Mokaram

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding allowance of judgment notwithstanding the verdict where no expert medical testimony on causation
  • describing plaintiffs’ burden of proof for injuries sustained in crashworthiness cases
  • our appellate courts and those in other jurisdictions have recognized the necessity for expert medical testimony on highly technical medical issues, such as injury causation”
  • “Cases involving seriously injured children present perhaps the greatest risk that jurors will improperly be influenced by emotion and sympathy”
  • Product liability may be premised on “existence of some enhanced injury, i.e., an injury ‘over and above’ that which would have been sustained in the absence of the alleged defect.”
  • “While it is trac that generally a plaintiff may rely on inferences to defeat a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, those inferences cannot be based on mere speculation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.