Alhuay v. U.S. Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding absence of interpreter at hearing on applications for waiver of removability and cancellation of removal did not violate due process given alien had “no cognizable due process interest because those forms of relief are discretionary”
• dismissing a petition for lack of jurisdiction to the extent that the petitioner sought review of the agency’s denial of her claim for cancellation of removal
• reviewing a due process claim based in part on the lack of an interpreter
• “what constitutes an ‘exceptional and extremely unusual hardship’ is itself a discretionary determination”
• rejecting argument equating Attorney General’s removal and rescission authorities
• “Allegations of constitutional violations must be ‘colorable.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).