Skip to main content
· 3/26/2015

Alfredo Salvattera v. Isela Ramirez

Citations

  • 111 A.3d 1032
  • 2015 D.C. App. LEXIS 109
  • 2015 WL 1432616

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ―[T]he trial court, in the exercise of its discretion, should only enter a CPO against a party for reasons consistent with the underlying purposes of the Intrafamily Offenses Act.‖

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glickman, Fisher, Steadman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.