Alfredo Aviles v. Cornell Forge Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an employer's filing of a false police report was an \adverse employment action\ for the purposes of a Title VII retaliation claim
• holding that an employer’s filing of a false police report was an “adverse employment action” for purposes of a Title VII retaliation claim
• holding that retaliatory conduct which does not impact on employment can be actionable under Title VII, at least for a current employee
• holding that the plaintiff did not show at summary judgment that a supervisor’s threat was related to his termination where he adduced no evidence concerning the time the alleged threat was made
• reversing sua sponte judgment because plaintiff “presented enough evidence” to establish a viable claim
• court improperly granted sua sponte sum- mary judgment on issue raised in movant’s reply brief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).