Alfred v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Alfred’s claim that counsel coached him to lie during the plea colloquy did not require an évidentiary hearing
• “A defendant is bound by his sworn answers during a plea colloquy and cannot later disavow those answers by asserting that he lied during the colloquy at counsel's direction.”
• “A defendant is bound by his sworn answers during a plea colloquy and cannot later disavow those answers by asserting that he lied during the colloquy at counsel’s direction.”
• \A defendant is bound by his sworn answers during a plea colloquy ....\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rodriguez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-06-07· cited 10×
• Wisnia Etienne v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-07-29· cited 1×
• Rivero v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-09-25· cited 1×
• Dejesus v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-08-29