Alfred v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “fairness requires that the court adhere to the terms of its agreement, and conduct a probation revocation hearing, not a contempt hearing”
• “When a defendant violates a condition of probation, we believe that fairness requires that the court adhere to the terms of its agreement, and conduct a probation revocation hearing, not a contempt hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Williams
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1989-06-22· cited 17×
• Hurd v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2005-02-11· cited 14×
• A.W. v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2005-03-17· cited 11×
• Sweezey v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2007-08-31· cited 10×
• Bland v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1993-02-12· cited 8×
• Finn v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1991-11-13· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Nicely
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2010-11-18· cited 4×
• State of Minnesota v. Miranda Lynn Jones
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-08-26· cited 4×
• AW v. Com.
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2005-06-16
• Moses v. People of the VI
  Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2026-03-04

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Osslo
  California Supreme Court· 1958-12-23· cited 85×
• State v. Montgomery
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1977-06-17· cited 72×
• State v. Randolph
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-02-23· cited 48×
• Brown v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1977-01-31· cited 32×
• People v. Mowery
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-07-25· cited 31×
• State v. Jackson
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1978-11-30· cited 28×
• People v. Patrick
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-05-07· cited 25×