Alfred R. Scicluna v. Harry G. Wells

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that qualified immunity did not protect defendant guard where plaintiff was “a member of an identifiable group of prisoners for whom risk of assault was a serious problem”
• finding that Estelle’s prohibition of deliberate indifference to an inmate’s serious medical needs is clearly established law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).