Alfred P. Gilliam v. Joseph A. Califano, Secretary, Health, Education & Welfare of the United States or Successor or Successors in Office

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We conclude that the vocational expert’s testimony was fatally deficient because the hypothetical question failed precisely to set out all the claimant’s impairments.”
• \We conclude that the vocational expert's testimony was fatally deficient because the hypothetical question failed precisely to set out all the claimant's impairments.\
• \The only evidence in the record to support the ALJ’s finding that [claimant] could engage in substantial gainful activity is the testimony of the vocational expert.\
• hypothetical stating claimant capable of light or exertional work defective because failed to include claimant's inability to put on shirt without assistance, tie shoes, operate light switch, or walk 150 feet

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).