· 1/31/1973
Alfred OCHOA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MONSANTO COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Citations
- 473 F.2d 318
- 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11914
- 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8437
- 5 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 483
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \the smallness of the numbers demonstrates that the Court was not compelled to allow such statistical showing to set in train the usual presumptions\
- 'But the smallness of the numbers demonstrates that the Court was not compelled to allow such statistical showing to set in train the usual presumptions or to make a finding of preference thereon.'
- “But the smallness of the numbers demonstrates that the Court was not compelled to allow such statistical showing to set in train the usual presumptions or to make a finding of preference thereon.”
- “the smallness of the numbers demonstrates that the Court was not compelled to allow such statistical showing to set in train the usual presumptions”
- 'Accord statistical evidence great and oft-times decisive weight'
- “Accord statistical evidence great and oft-times decisive weight”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown, Moore, Roney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.