Skip to main content
· 1/31/1973

Alfred OCHOA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MONSANTO COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 473 F.2d 318
  • 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11914
  • 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8437
  • 5 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 483

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \the smallness of the numbers demonstrates that the Court was not compelled to allow such statistical showing to set in train the usual presumptions\
  • 'But the smallness of the numbers demonstrates that the Court was not compelled to allow such statistical showing to set in train the usual presumptions or to make a finding of preference thereon.'
  • “But the smallness of the numbers demonstrates that the Court was not compelled to allow such statistical showing to set in train the usual presumptions or to make a finding of preference thereon.”
  • “the smallness of the numbers demonstrates that the Court was not compelled to allow such statistical showing to set in train the usual presumptions”
  • 'Accord statistical evidence great and oft-times decisive weight'
  • “Accord statistical evidence great and oft-times decisive weight”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Moore, Roney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.