Skip to main content
· 7/18/1990

Alfred Lancellotti v. Honorable Thomas F. Fay, Etc.

Citations

  • 909 F.2d 15
  • 17 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 709
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 12081
  • 1990 WL 98658

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing between the reasonable inquiry clause and the improper purpose clause under Rule 11 and concluding that sanctions are warranted for violations to any of the two
  • Rule 11 sanctions may be imposed either for filings made with an improper purpose or for filings made without reasonable inquiry
  • “It is ... for nisi prius to decide what sanction is ‘appropriate’ anent a particular violation [of Rule 11].”
  • if court finds a violation, \the court may ... impose an appropriate sanction\ (emphasis added)
  • federal court may not entertain action seeking to enjoin state court from enforcing orders entered in state divorce proceedings
  • Rule 11 sanctions may be imposed due to groundless but “sincere” pleadings as well as for pleadings that though not meritless have been filed in bad faith

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breyer, Bownes, Selya

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.