Alfred L. Stone v. Landis Construction Company, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that loss of potential employment was not actionable under the CPPA in part because, “virtually without exception, courts in other jurisdictions have rejected arguments that their consumer protection statutes encompass employment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).