Alfred L. Owens v. TIAA, FSB

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding “no” response to rights advisement form was ambiguous when the service member previously indicated, several times immediately preceding the “no” response, that he wanted to discuss the matter with investigators
• “Military officials and civil- ians acting on their behalf are required to provide rights warnings prior to interrogating a member of the armed forces if that servicemember is a sus- pect, irrespective of custody. Article 31(b), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 831(b) (2000
• “Military officials and civil- ians acting on their behalf are required to provide rights warnings prior to interrogating a member of the armed forces if that servicemember is a sus- pect, irrespective of custody. Article 31(b), [Uni- form Code of Military Justice (UCMJ

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).