ALFRED, JR., GEORGE, PEOPLE v

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting counsel’s duty to challenge irrelevant and meritless positions and advance only those in the defendant’s best interest
• reviewing for abuse of discretion the district court’s order denying motion to discharge appointed counsel
• applying the good-faith exception and noting that, at the time the Government obtained the disclosure orders at issue, binding Eleventh Circuit precedent held that a § 2703(d) disclosure order comported with the Fourth Amendment and was not constitutionally unreasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).