Alfred H. Greening, Jr. v. Thomas J. Moran, Individually and as Former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Illinois

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “it is not appropriate to address the merits in a case to which Younger applies” because “[t]o say that abstention is in order ... is to say that federal courts should not address the merits, period”
• “Now that the state proceeding has reached its end, abstention is no longer appropriate.”
• attorney disciplinary proceeding before state supreme court is judicial in nature

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).