Alfred Bell & Co. Ltd. v. Catalda Fine Arts, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• price-fixing agreement “explicitly confined to Great Britain and Ireland” not violative of United States antitrust laws
• “[T]he doctrine of anticipation . . . does not apply to copyrights. . . . The ‘author’ is entitled to a copyright if he independently contrived a work completely identical with what went before.”
• mezzotints of old masters’ paintings entitled to copyright

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).