Skip to main content
· 6/29/1972

Alford v. Eyman

Citations

  • 408 U.S. 939
  • 92 S. Ct. 2874

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting decisions holding that contracts for software package development are for goods, not services
  • noting decisions holding that contracts for software package development are for goods, not services

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.