Alfonso v. Skadden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[tjhe presumption supporting judgments does not apply when the record affirmatively reveals a jurisdictional defect”
• holding that “[t]he presumption supporting judgments does not apply when the record affirmatively reveals a jurisdictional defect”
• holding that “[t]he presumption supporting judgments does not apply when the record affirmatively reveals a jurisdictional defect”
• recognizing that lack of subject matter jurisdiction may be raised at any time, including in action to enforce underlying judgment, if void for lack of jurisdiction
• holding that the trial court orders were subject to a collateral attack and were unenforceable due to the trial court’s lack of subject-matter jurisdiction over the dispute
• holding that subject-matter jurisdiction cannot be waived and can be raised at any time

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).