Alfono v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding case because “plaintiff specifically objected to the ... IEP ... [and the] Hearing Officer did not address [that] matter in his determination”
• granting the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment because DCPS failed to complete the child’s individualized educational plan before the start of the school year
• “[A] written, complete IEP is important to serve a parent’s interest in receiving full appraisal of the educational plan for her child, allowing a parent to both monitor her child’s progress and determine if any change to the program is necessary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).