Alf v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that in an unambiguous insurance policy, “the policy language is construed according to its usual and ordinary meaning”
• providing that in an unambiguous insurance policy, “the policy language is construed according to its usual and ordinary meaning”
• noting that “contract may be ambiguous because it is unclear or omits terms.”
• rejecting the argument that an exclusion was ambiguous and unenforceable because it was inconsistent with the expectation of coverage
• rejecting the argument that an exclusion was ambiguous and unenforceable because it was inconsistent with the expectation of coverage
• rejecting the argument that an exclusion was ambiguous and unenforceable because it was inconsistent with the expectation of coverage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).