Alexandra Ottaviano, Administratrix v. Tiffany R. Durst

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a petitioner’s § 2254 petition was untimely because his “resentenc- ing did not impose a new judgment as to the undisturbed counts of conviction” which he sought to challenge
• holding that a petitioner’s § 2254 petition was untimely because his “resentenc- ing did not impose a new judgment as to the undisturbed counts of conviction” which he sought to challenge
• analyzing when a resentencing results in a new judgment as to every count of a conviction or only some counts of a conviction
• analyzing when a resentencing results in a new judgment as to every count of a conviction or only some counts of a conviction
• “[The issue] is whether, where some but not all counts of conviction are disturbed on appeal or in post-conviction proceedings, the defendant’s eventual resentencing is a new judgment as to the undisturbed counts of conviction. We conclude the answer is no.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).