Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that there is “little doubt that Congress’ concern was * * * with displacements caused by the acquisition of property for a Government program or project”
• noting, in reviewing the federal relocation assistance program statute, “Section 101(6
• Tenants forced to relocate by foreclosure on housing project with federally guaranteed financing, are not “displaced persons”
• “[T]he legislative history of the written order clause reveals no congressional intent to extend relocation benefits beyond the acquisition context.”
• “[T]he legislative history of the written order clause reveals no congressional intent to extend relocation benefits - 35 - beyond the acquisition context.”
• short, general statement of purpose not intended to be substantive departure from Congress’ statutory design

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).