Alexander v. State Automobile Mutual Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that provided they ‘“do not conflict with the spirit and intent of the uninsured and underinsured motorists statutes[,]’ ” “ ‘[¡Insurers may incorporate such terms, conditions and exclusions in an automobile insurance policy as may be consistent with the premium charged’ ’’
• explaining that UIM coverage “is intended to benefit the person who bought the policy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).