Alexander v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The fact that the electrical plug had been removed from the electrical outlet demonstrates that the plug had to be moved interiorly as to the place of business thereby constituting an intrusion and an entry.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Williams v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 1999-08-25· cited 18×
• Ruben Urrutia v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2006-06-16
• Jorge Luis Banuelos v. State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2009-04-02
• State v. Jamel McLelland Fowler
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2018-07-06
• Edwing Ahmed Alvarez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2018-08-01

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Clark v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-11-10· cited 105×
• Ortega v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-12-08· cited 87×
• Marroquin v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-02-03· cited 59×
• Griffin v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-06-05· cited 34×
• Jones v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1970-07-22· cited 26×
• Coleman v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-12-17· cited 11×
• Turner v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1957-05-29· cited 5×