Alexander v. State
Citations
- 29 Tex. 495
Syllabus
<p>Article 395 of the Code of Criminal Procedure declares, that an indictment must describe the offense in plain and intelligible words. (Paschal’s Dig., Art. 2863, div. 7.) This means, that the accused must be charged to have done some act which violates a law, and the particular facts must be set out with certainty.</p> <p>The certainty required in an indictment is such as will enable the accused to plead the judgment that might be given upon it in bar of any prosecution for the same offense. (Paschal’s Dig., Art. 2865, Note 722.)</p> <p>It is not sufficient to aver that the defendant did sell liquors in quantities less than a quart, without obtaining a license therefor; but it must be stated at whose house or establishment, or to whom the vending took place, or soma other fact tending to identify the transaction. (Paschal’s Dig., Art. 2075, Note 654.)</p>
Judges: Bell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Fehringer v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1915-01-15· cited 11×
- Dixon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1886-06-16· cited 6×
- Barnett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1951-10-24· cited 5×
- W. C. Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1884-05-14· cited 1×
- Mosely v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1885-05-29· cited 1×
- Lamkin v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 1874-07-01
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1876-07-01
- White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1878-07-01
- Hoskey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1880-07-01
- Mansfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1885-01-31
- Whitworth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1882-06-15
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.