Alexander v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the motion was not time- barred by section 99-39-5(2) because it fit squarely within the statutory exception of challenges to the revocation of parole

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Edmond v. MISSISSIPPI DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2001-04-12· cited 32×
• Morris v. State
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2011-06-28· cited 8×
• Scott v. State
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2010-01-05· cited 4×
• Walters v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2009-11-19· cited 4×
• Hester v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1999-05-13· cited 3×
• Mendez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-02-13· cited 2×
• Alexander v. Epps
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2012-08-28· cited 1×
• Alexander v. State
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2002-02-26· cited 1×
• Anthony Jenkins v. State of MS
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1997-04-07
• Leroy Taylor McCray v. State of Mississippi
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1995-05-16
• Lafayette Wells v. State of Mississippi
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1995-03-11
• David E. Hester v. State of Mississippi
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1996-05-23
• Albert Edmond v. Mississippi Department of Corrections
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1999-12-21
• Christopher Wayne Walters v. State of Mississippi
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2008-10-09
• State of Florida v. L. C.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-10-16

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Moore v. Ruth
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1990-02-07· cited 85×
• Morris v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1991-02-27· cited 83×
• Moore v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1991-10-09· cited 40×
• Alexander v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1978-04-19· cited 11×