Alexander v. Kentucky Bar Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding defendant preserved her directed verdict argument because she moved for directed verdict at the close of the Commonwealth’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence
• holding defendant preserved her directed verdict argument because she moved for directed verdict at the close of the Commonwealth’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence
• insufficient proof of substantial danger of death or serious physical injury for wanton endangerment conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).