Alexander v. Jackson Radiology Associates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Rule 37 does not “explicitly provide for sanctions for discovery abuse absent a court order”
• reviewing the “totality of the circumstances presented” in determining that sanctions were warranted pursuant to the trial court’s “inherent authority to take actions to prevent abuse of the discovery process”
• involving a situation where there was “blatant, inexcusable, [and] repeated lying” about discovery abuse
• affirming award of sanctions even when non-compliance with an order was not at issue
• recognizing the trial court’s “inherent authority”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).