Skip to main content

Alexander v. Inman

Citations

  • 825 S.W.2d 102
  • 1991 Tenn. App. LEXIS 718

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding defendant’s affair with plaintiff’s wife, though inappropriate and unacceptable, did not constitute outrageous conduct as defined by our courts and the RESTATEMENT
  • applying retroactively the Tennessee Supreme Court’s abolition of the common-law tort of alienation of -5- affections
  • defendant’s adulterous affair with plaintiff’s wife and his perjury concerning these activities would not “in these days and times [be found by] an average member of the community . . . to be so atrocious that it goes beyond the bounds of decency”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koch, Lewis, Cantrell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.