Skip to main content
· 10/29/1969

Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education

Citations

  • 396 U.S. 19
  • 90 S. Ct. 29
  • 24 L. Ed. 2d 19
  • 1969 U.S. LEXIS 624

About this case

Jump to content

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1969 United States Supreme Court case

English Wikisource has original text related to this article:

**Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education **

Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education, 396 U.S. 19 (1969), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ordered immediate desegregation of public schools in the American South . It followed 15 years of delays to integrate by most Southern school boards after the Court's ruling in _Brown v. Board of Education _ (1954) that segregated public schools were unconstitutional.

Background

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alexander_v._Holmes_County_Board_of_Education&action=edit&section=1 "Edit section: Background")
]

Justice Felix Frankfurter demanded that the opinion in 1955's Brown v. Board of Education II order desegregation with "all deliberate speed".[1] The South took it as an excuse to emphasize "deliberate" over "speed" and conducted resistance to desegregating schools, in some jurisdictions closing public schools altogether. For 15 years, schools in the South remained segregated.[2] In 1968, freedom of choice plans had been condemned by the Supreme Court in _Green v. County School Board of New Kent County _.

Case

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alexander_v._Holmes_County_Board_of_Education&action=edit&section=2 "Edit section: Case")
]

Holmes County

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alexander_v._Holmes_County_Board_of_Education&action=edit&section=3 "Edit section: Holmes County")
]

Beatrice Alexander, mother of children, sued the Holmes County, Mississippi School District , arguing the district made no meaningful attempt to integrate its schools, basing her opinion on the small number of black pupils in mainly White schools.[3]

Procedural history

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alexander_v._Holmes_County_Board_of_Education&action=edit&section=4 "Edit section: Procedural history")
]

Early in the summer of 1969, the federal appeals court had asked the US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW) to submit desegregation plans for thirty-three school districts in Mississippi including Holmes County School District , so HEW could order them implemented at the beginning of the school year.[4] [5] HEW was responsible for drawing up desegregation plans, as mandated by the 1964 Civil Rights Act , and had submitted the plans on time.[4] [4] At the last minute, however, both HEW and the Justice Department asked Judge William Harold Cox for extensions until December 1, claiming that the plans would result in confusion and setbacks.[4] This was the first time the federal government had supported a desegregation delay in the federal courts.[4] [Note 1] The Fifth Circuit granted the delay, and no specific date for implementing the desegregation plans was set.[4] [7]

Justice Hugo Black , the supervisory justice for the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, and senior Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, considered this delay to be Nixon's payoff to the South, after its electoral support had helped him win the presidential election, and as part of his "Southern Strategy " of appealing to conservative whites.[8] [9] The NAACP Legal Defense Fund contacted Black to contest the delay in desegregation.[10] On September 3, Black received a memo from the Justice Department – Solicitor General Griswold was urging Black to permit the Mississippi delay.[11] Black reluctantly permitted the delay as supervisory Justice but invited the NAACP Legal Defense Fund to bring the case to the Supreme Court as soon as possible.[12] [13] The case was brought as Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education.

Issue at question

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alexander_v._Holmes_County_Board_of_Education&action=edit&section=5 "Edit section: Issue at question")
]

The desegregation orders of Brown I and Brown II had not been followed for more than a decade, and schools in the South were desegregating slowly if at all.[11] During lower court battles over segregation, school districts would remain segregated until all appeals were exhausted.[14] The petitioners and others suing the Holmes County Board of Education in Mississippi for failure to desegregate, were represented by Jack Greenberg . They asked the Court to order the original HEW plans to be implemented, and proposed that the Court shift the burden of proof, making desegregation the main objective of plans.[14]

Internal Court deliberations

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alexander_v._Holmes_County_Board_of_Education&action=edit&section=6 "Edit section: Internal Court deliberations")
]

New Chief Justice Warren Burger , appointed by President Nixon, did not at first think that the requested delay was unreasonable.[15] Senior Associate Justice Hugo Black , an Alabamian himself, thought that allowing any delay was a signal to the South to further delay desegregation; he suggested a short, simple order mandating immediate integration, with no mention of debate over plans or delay.[15] [16] He also threatened to dissent from any opinion mentioning the word "plan," which would shatter a much-desired unanimous Court opinion.[17] Justice William O. Douglas supported Black.[18] Justice Harlan did not support any notion of "immediate desegregation", but he did support overturning the Fifth Circuit's delay.[19] Justices Stewart, White, and Brennan were all initially put off by Black's demands for immediate desegregation.[20] Justice Thurgood Marshall , the Court's only African American, suggested an implementation deadline of January, the beginning of the next school semester.[21]

A majority of justices agreed on three elements:[21]

  1. reversing the appeals court's decisions to grant a delay in the submission of plans
  2. keeping the Court of Appeals in control
  3. excluding the federal district court from a role due to its years of allowing stalling.

Warren Burger, along with justices White a

Editorial context from Wikipedia (CC-BY-SA 4.0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “all deliberate speed” doctrine in school desegregation abrogated
  • 15 years after Brown v. Board , Mississippi continued to maintain segregated schools, prompting the Supreme Court to tell the State that it was \the obligation of every school district ... to terminate dual school systems at once and to operate now and hereafter only unitary schools.\
  • Special opinion by Chief Judge Brown

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.